No hablo con policías, Parte 1
Sr. James Duane, profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de Regent y un ex abogado de la defensa, le dice por qué usted nunca debe estar de acuerdo en ser entrevistado por la policía.
producido por kalmplex http://twitter.com/kalmplex ¿Tienes que mostrar su identificación a la policía? Abogado, Davin Charney, ofrece una visión general de la ley en Canadá. Producido fo … Video Calificación: 4/5
Why is this dude talking so damn fast? My ears are hurting just listening
to him.
First rule when dealing with cops: STFU.
An interesting argument on why someone should never speak to the police
even if they are innocent.
Since Ken posted that story about the police, I think it is time we review
why you should not talk to the police. Here is part 1 of a 2 part video.
279 people are cops or work for the federal government.
I suppose I should already have known this …
#lawenforcement #criminaljusticesystem
Haha, Chicago PD?
Nice Plug on Chicago PD (NBC) tonight.
Definately don’t, oh except of course when you need help. Cheezy
sleaseball.
I’m already starting to see a big problem with the justice system… the
“can and will be used against you… but can not be used to help you” bit
is awful. Why can is it “evidence” when they’re trying to convict someone,
and “hearsay” when they’re trying to save someone?
Can someone explain this to me? Please? There has to be a good reason, if
not I think it’ll drive me nuts…
Mr. James Duane, a professor at Regent Law School and a former defense
attorney, explains why you should never agree to be interviewed by the
police.
Look for the original version without the intrusive comments.
Better call Saul
Be sure to watch both parts.
Messi’s father.
That’s my dad!
We have found the IRL Saul Goodman. Next to find the IRL Walter and IRL
Jesse.
How much cocaine is this guy on? Sheesh…
As a counterargument I offer this: search Google for “Susan Marguerite
Nelles” and follow a link to Google Books. Read the top of page 138 of the
book “The Nurses are Innocent”. NOT talking was taken as an admission of
guilt, just like the TV shows.
police will lie plant evidence frame and on the stand to convict u i know i
live in LA, CAL
Bogus law
Don’t say a word!
Published on May 15, 2012
Mr. James Duane, a professor at Regent Law School and a former defense
attorney, tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the
police.
I think I’ve had one dealing with police and it was when I caught the
people who stole my cell phone and told the transit security I wanted to
charge them. I was an upset seventeen year old. The two officers I dealt
with were very patient with me and even let me borrow their cell phone to
call my parents and let them know I was okay (seeing as how the thieves had
ditched my phone and someone else walked off with it). Seeing as how my
first (and only) experience was good and school has taught me to trust
police, if an officer asks for my ID and tells me why he needs it, I would
have no issue showing it to him. Police are people too and as long as they
treat me like a person, I will return the favor.
If they stop you and try to say a crime was reported in the area and you
are in the area, thereby giving them probable cause to approach you, the
first thing you ask for is an Occurrence number, this ties their story to
fact, not fishing.
what if they just think your someone they are looking for because next time
they ask me that i am going to say can i know why i need to give my name
Application of Charter
32. (1) This Charter applies
(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the
Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
(b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all
matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
The charter dose not apply to you apply to you.
Now get your head out of your butt and go read the thing for your self.
Guthrie Alberta case of precedent but do not allow yourself to get scammed
into 1. Being a person. and 2 Being a subject of the charter…Section 32
clearly tells you who that rag applies to….type section 32 and heritage
into your search engine..your getting scammed by a lawyer into thinking
your subject to commercial statute applicable to only corportate entitires
carrying corporate ID..Read James 2:9 in the book his boss swore to
defend…
you cannot do this at a DUI checkpoint,,, if you refuse , you’ll end up
with your ass kicked and in jail.
BORING!
But it’s okay for cops to lie to you?!?!
Say nothing.Assist the police never.Leave your id at home.
good to know!!!!
But the police can lie to you!
Actually @WakeUpToTheNWO2 the charter does not apply to persons at all. The
Charter specifically states that it only applies to the government and
government bodies.
Great info, just to recap, If I were caught in a chargeable provincial
offense, and chose not to say anything or give any id. Would I also obtain
an obstruction charge?
no id cards lol have any for saskatchewan
What i hate about all this is that an officer can just make up a story like
you jaywalked when you didnt and request id, there is no way you can prove
that the cop is lying. Now i know they have a oath to follow but some of
them dont care, being a cop does not make you a good person or someon who
is not a liar. An evil person can also be a cop and do whatever he wants
just by making stuff up. This is are world, awesome right?
you may not have to show id, but do you have to give your real name
verbally if they ask?
Ice T said it best ” Fuck The Police “
@WakeUpToTheNWO2 The fact is that the Charter of rights is the law, The
bill of rights was a half baked charter of rights and freedoms. On the
other side you are right the charter applies to everyone and what it does
is it gives rights to corporations, rights that they always had. The truth
is that common law is a general term that has multiple meanings. In reality
common law is not a law system, rather what common law stands for is
ADVERSARIAL LAW as opposed to INQUISITORIAL LAW. So Adversarial law is a
law system that the British where placed under. Contrary to the rest of the
world who functions under inquisitorial law. Inquisitorial law is in my
opinion a better system for the common people where the government is
actually responsible for human beings as well as corporations. In
Adversarial law the government is not as responsible for human beings and
is a system more attuned to the needs of corporations.
In the situation you mentioned where the cop wants to write a ticket to a
bicyclist,
the offense is under the Motor Vehicle Act (provincial), and the cyclist
doesn’t identify himself….(note: bicyclists are not required to be
licensed).
the cop charged the cyclist with “obstruction of a peace officer” which is
a Criminal Code offense (Not an offense listed in the MVA), even though the
Criminal Code (federal) was not being enforced at the time.
The Motor Vehicle Act (a provincial statute) has its own definition of a
Peace Officer which is different from the Criminal Code and under the MVA
there is no offense of Obstructing a Peace Officer under that Act’s
definition.
Can you please give your opinion about the cop filing a federal charge
under the Criminal Code when he is actually enforcing a provincial statute,
the MVA?
It sounds like the cop is confused.
thx….. great advice!!!
“Criminal Offence” of “Obstructing police”, huh?
Lying is just a way of life for you sleazeball lawyers, isn’t it?
You are claiming “Obstruct Police” is a CRIME? Really?
WHO’S THE INJURED PARTY IN THAT CRIME, YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT?
YOU NEVER have to identify yourself. EVER. Sleazeballs like this like to
lie about what a “crime” even IS.
NO INJURY=NO CRIME
THIS SLEAZEBALL IS LYING TO YOU.
You have the Right to remain silent yes but you do not have the right to
hide your Identity from anyone within the Police force if they suspect you
of a illegal activity and refuse to show your ID or state your name then
they will just get a search warrant within 10-20mins or less then they will
find anything you are hiding.. Therefore always show ID… You honestly
have no reason to refuse you will get fucked in the long run.. THINK guys
ID is GIVEN to you to prove your age and to show WHO you are it isn’t
something to hide you will be fucked..
When I witness a crime in progress…why does 911 operator want my name, my
address, my BIRTHDATE? Cannot I not refuse to give my birthdate? I have my
name, phone number and address. Isn’t that enough?
holey shit, I live in Canada all my life and never herd off cops killing
anyone innocent why not just show them ur id, perhaps they have a good
reason for asking don’t be a dick
Do you have to carry I.D.? Is it illegal not to?