Comments on: No hablo con policías, Parte 1

By: holmsatlarge

holmsatlarge — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:46:29 +0000

Do you have to carry I.D.? Is it illegal not to?

By: bjj obsession

bjj obsession — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:09:34 +0000

holey shit, I live in Canada all my life and never herd off cops killing
anyone innocent why not just show them ur id, perhaps they have a good
reason for asking don’t be a dick

By: Lead Power

Lead Power — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:38:04 +0000

When I witness a crime in progress…why does 911 operator want my name, my
address, my BIRTHDATE? Cannot I not refuse to give my birthdate? I have my
name, phone number and address. Isn’t that enough?

By: Kody Drozda

Kody Drozda — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:03:31 +0000

You have the Right to remain silent yes but you do not have the right to
hide your Identity from anyone within the Police force if they suspect you
of a illegal activity and refuse to show your ID or state your name then
they will just get a search warrant within 10-20mins or less then they will
find anything you are hiding.. Therefore always show ID… You honestly
have no reason to refuse you will get fucked in the long run.. THINK guys
ID is GIVEN to you to prove your age and to show WHO you are it isn’t
something to hide you will be fucked..

By: Rogue Support

Rogue Support — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:38:41 +0000

“Criminal Offence” of “Obstructing police”, huh?

Lying is just a way of life for you sleazeball lawyers, isn’t it?

You are claiming “Obstruct Police” is a CRIME? Really?

WHO’S THE INJURED PARTY IN THAT CRIME, YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT?

YOU NEVER have to identify yourself. EVER. Sleazeballs like this like to
lie about what a “crime” even IS.

NO INJURY=NO CRIME

THIS SLEAZEBALL IS LYING TO YOU.

By: P Law

P Law — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:59:29 +0000

thx….. great advice!!!

By: adrien nicholson

adrien nicholson — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:48:05 +0000

In the situation you mentioned where the cop wants to write a ticket to a
bicyclist,
the offense is under the Motor Vehicle Act (provincial), and the cyclist
doesn’t identify himself….(note: bicyclists are not required to be
licensed).
the cop charged the cyclist with “obstruction of a peace officer” which is
a Criminal Code offense (Not an offense listed in the MVA), even though the
Criminal Code (federal) was not being enforced at the time.
The Motor Vehicle Act (a provincial statute) has its own definition of a
Peace Officer which is different from the Criminal Code and under the MVA
there is no offense of Obstructing a Peace Officer under that Act’s
definition.
Can you please give your opinion about the cop filing a federal charge
under the Criminal Code when he is actually enforcing a provincial statute,
the MVA?
It sounds like the cop is confused.

By: luegos L

luegos L — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:57:32 +0000

@WakeUpToTheNWO2 The fact is that the Charter of rights is the law, The
bill of rights was a half baked charter of rights and freedoms. On the
other side you are right the charter applies to everyone and what it does
is it gives rights to corporations, rights that they always had. The truth
is that common law is a general term that has multiple meanings. In reality
common law is not a law system, rather what common law stands for is
ADVERSARIAL LAW as opposed to INQUISITORIAL LAW. So Adversarial law is a
law system that the British where placed under. Contrary to the rest of the
world who functions under inquisitorial law. Inquisitorial law is in my
opinion a better system for the common people where the government is
actually responsible for human beings as well as corporations. In
Adversarial law the government is not as responsible for human beings and
is a system more attuned to the needs of corporations.

By: Troy Brown

Troy Brown — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:57:24 +0000

Ice T said it best ” Fuck The Police “

By: fnog9

fnog9 — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:20:32 +0000

you may not have to show id, but do you have to give your real name
verbally if they ask?