Comments on: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney – Ayuda instantánea 713 242-1779 en Houston

By: johndeeregreen21

johndeeregreen21 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:07:47 +0000

This idiot will change his mind when one of his family members is killed by a drunk driver. Or maybe just maybe a drunk driver will kill him. This is a prime example of a pond scum atterney.

By: MrMapleleaf2006

MrMapleleaf2006 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:03:13 +0000

He is not talking about people who got drunk and killed somebody. He is talking about people like all the rest of us who had a drink and boom they were over the limit all of the sudden. Question is why?

By: MrMapleleaf2006

MrMapleleaf2006 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:57:42 +0000

If you drive drunk and kill somebody, it’s a totally different case. He is talking about the discretion of the police. Those guys will charge you with anything if they want to and exagerate the facts so the prosecutor will go ahead regardless. You could be innocent. But according to them you would be the worst drinker in the world.

By: Steelhorsecowboy

Steelhorsecowboy — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:19:23 +0000

.1 was DUI a few years ago. Today .08 is DUI. Reality has not changed however the law has. It does not take into account size, age, medical condition or what you ate today. It is a false premise. Some say it is about safety others say it is about revenue enhancement. They do not use breathalyzer in a hospital because it is not deemed scientifically accurate.

By: awbacker

awbacker — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:44:48 +0000

The 40% figure wrong. But I’m sure it works in a courtroom, because no one else understands either. You can’t add percentages like that. I should say that I still agree with what he is saying, and his points, but the math… it hurts!

By: AMofuckinBoss

AMofuckinBoss — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:15:36 +0000

I disagree. Doing so isn’t reasonable if what you are trying to do is prevent damages from drunk drivers. Out of every drunk driver arrested in a night approximately 2,000 are out driving in the average municipality alone. Criminalizing people who have a drink or two after a dinner or gathering etc.. who are perfectly capable of driving doesn’t make sense when law enforcement could be out focusing on REAL drunk reckless drivers they dont catch already. Plus, what about duress?

By: estasak13

estasak13 — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:25:43 +0000

@grapevinelane and what limit our rights even more? Putting any more restrictions on alcohol is not Needed. We dont need to be pushing toward prohibition. Do u realize how many farmers and buisnesses that hurts

By: Orlando Tax

Orlando Tax — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:37:33 +0000

I had a driving drunk assault howcould I acquire your lawyer to ensure that i am able to seek help from them. They formerly get my licensed I’m really worried how to get it back to me.

By: David Katz

David Katz — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:24:24 +0000

Real. Direct. Love it!

By: Sydney TrafficLawyers

Sydney TrafficLawyers — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:18:27 +0000

We are very impressed with your presentation. A lot of lessons we can take from this. We will check out the rest of your presentations videos. Thank you! @sydneytrafficlaw